See beyond the account in the report.

Search public sources from a reported game account, email, handle, or link. Bring the results into your review queue and keep the context for the next moderator.

A report is a starting point, not a verdict.

A player reports a copycat Epic account asking for gift cards. Resolve the reported display name, inspect available public account links, then compare them with your own platform evidence.

Player reportAccount impersonation

“This account is using the creator’s name and asking players to send gift cards.”

Reported identifierEpic Games display name
Start with the name in the report

Epic Games

Resolve the reported display name

Check the account record

Stable Epic account ID
Compare with your report
Linked accounts
Review where available

Keep the review together

Save the source details and unresolved questions beside the original report. Your team makes the policy decision.

Not every report starts with a player name.

Some cases start with an email, a public handle, or a link. Search each identifier on its own terms; a shared name is a lead, not a confirmed identity.

A seller moves payment to email.

A buyer forwards the seller’s off-platform payment request.

Reported identifier

payments@shop.example

Google

Email search

Inspect when available

Public profile · Displayed name · Source link

Compare any returned profile with the message the buyer supplied.

A handle appears in a harassment report.

A moderator receives the reported Discord username and screenshots.

Reported identifier

creator_support

Discord

Username search

Inspect when available

Public account · Profile details · Source link

Check the original profile and any stable ID against the report.

A giveaway link spreads through comments.

Several users report a site asking for their game login.

Reported identifier

rewards.example

Domain

Domain Intelligence

Inspect when available

Registration · DNS records · HTTP response

Inspect the live destination and domain records before acting.

Keep your review queue. Add the source context.

Send the emails, usernames, and domains from incoming reports to the Search API. Each completed check sends a signed webhook with the result, ready to attach to the originating report.

Reviewers see the public sources beside the original report. Your own signals and policy still decide the action.

Osintly shared History listing saved searches and their authors

Let the next shift reopen the sources.

A night reviewer checks a reported account. The morning team can reopen the saved search, read the source details, and see what is still unverified.

Organization investigations hold searches, notes, and supplied files together. Every organization member can read its projects.

Read the workflow.

Questions from Trust & Safety teams.

The Search API accepts a username, email, domain, IP address, or cryptocurrency address. Focused Tools API checks can examine supported platform accounts, such as Epic Games. Results depend on the source, selected modules, and your plan.

Fit public-source checks into your review process.

Show us the reports your team reviews. We’ll help map the public checks, API volume, and shared workspace to your workflow.