Research that can be retraced, from finding to file.

Prepare public-source research for a dispute, a takedown, or a due diligence review. Keep the identifiers, saved searches, and working notes together for the people reviewing the matter.

A client reports a lookalike storefront.

The client sends the store’s URL and screenshots. Search its domain in Osintly to check registration details, the current HTTP response, and available archived pages before drafting a notice.

Compare the claim with the public record.

Check a counterparty’s claimed online history against the domain record and available archived pages. Keep the source links and any unanswered questions for counsel.

Counterparty’s claim

“We’ve operated online since 2018.”

Check the people named in a matter.

A complaint cites a Reddit profile; a contract lists an Epic creator code. Check each account in its own tool, review the public records, and leave uncertain matches open for counsel.

One credit pool for the firm.

A lawyer checks a disputed domain while a researcher follows an account named in a complaint. In an Osintly organization, both use the same credit balance instead of managing separate personal plans.

Seats build the pool

Each paid seat adds credits to the organization’s monthly balance.

Members share it

Research draws from one balance, rather than a separate allowance for each person.

The firm keeps oversight

The owner manages billing; owners and admins can review usage.

Read the workflow.

Questions from counsel.

Domain Intelligence can inspect registration data, DNS, HTTP behavior, certificates, and available archived pages. A published contact email can be searched separately. The fields returned depend on the domain and the sources that respond.

Make the research
reviewable by your firm.

Talk to us about matter volume, shared access, and the exports your lawyers need.